Our Proven Development System
A structured approach to creating arcade and simple games that engage players and serve their intended purpose.
Return HomeThe Foundation of Our Approach
Our methodology emerged from years of game development experience and a clear understanding of what makes arcade and simple games successful.
Core Belief: Clarity Over Complexity
We believe that engaging games come from clear, well-executed mechanics rather than overwhelming feature lists. This principle guides every development decision we make. When faced with choices about adding complexity, we consistently favor clarity and player understanding.
This philosophy stems from observing that players engage most deeply with games they understand intuitively. Arcade and simple games succeed precisely because they focus on doing a few things exceptionally well rather than attempting everything.
Evidence-Based Development
Our approach relies on testing and feedback rather than assumptions. We build prototypes early, gather actual player responses, and make adjustments based on observed behavior. This iterative process ensures that development decisions serve the actual experience rather than theoretical ideals.
Every game type has established patterns that tend to work well. We study these patterns, understand why they succeed, and apply those principles thoughtfully to your specific project rather than following formulas blindly.
Why This Methodology Developed
When we started Dudush Tetiana in 2019, we recognized that arcade and simple game development required a different approach than large-scale game production. These formats demand tight focus and careful balance rather than expansive features. We developed our methodology specifically to address the unique challenges of this game category.
Over six years and more than fifty projects, we've refined this approach through experience. Each project taught us something about what works consistently versus what depends heavily on context. This accumulated knowledge now informs how we approach new development work, allowing us to apply proven techniques while adapting to each project's specific needs.
The Dudush Tetiana Development Framework
Our development process follows a structured framework that ensures thorough attention to each aspect of your game.
Discovery and Planning
We begin by understanding your vision for the game and the experience you want to create. This involves detailed discussions about your goals, your intended audience, and what success looks like for your project. We examine similar games to identify patterns that work well and potential pitfalls to avoid.
During this phase, we develop a clear specification document that outlines core mechanics, player progression systems, and technical requirements. This document serves as our reference throughout development, ensuring we stay aligned with your original vision while making necessary adjustments.
Key Deliverable: Comprehensive game specification document with mechanics outline, technical architecture plan, and development timeline.
Core Mechanics Development
We build the fundamental gameplay loop first, focusing on making the basic interaction feel right before adding complexity. For kingdom-building games, this means establishing territory control and basic resource management. For educational games, this involves creating the core interaction that delivers learning value.
Testing begins early in this phase with simple prototypes. We observe how testers interact with basic mechanics and gather feedback about what feels intuitive versus confusing. These insights guide refinements before we build additional features on this foundation.
Key Deliverable: Functional prototype with core gameplay loop, initial testing results, and refinement plan based on feedback.
Feature Integration and Balance
With solid core mechanics established, we add additional features one at a time, testing each integration to ensure it enhances rather than complicates the experience. This systematic approach prevents feature creep and maintains the focused gameplay that makes arcade and simple games effective.
Balance work happens continuously during this phase. We adjust progression speeds, resource availability, and challenge difficulty based on actual play patterns. For save data migration projects, this phase involves developing and testing the migration protocols with sample data sets.
Key Deliverable: Feature-complete game build with balanced systems, comprehensive testing documentation, and adjustment logs.
Polish and Optimization
The refinement phase focuses on making every aspect of the game feel polished and professional. We address technical performance issues, refine user interface elements, and ensure all player feedback is clear and helpful. This attention to detail significantly impacts how players perceive the overall quality.
Extended play testing happens during this phase to identify edge cases and unusual player behaviors that might cause problems. We document all systems thoroughly to support future updates and ensure you understand how different elements work together.
Key Deliverable: Polished, launch-ready game with complete documentation, deployment plan, and support materials.
How Each Phase Builds on Previous Work
The sequential nature of our methodology ensures that problems get addressed early rather than discovered late in development. By establishing solid foundations before adding complexity, we avoid the common pitfall of building features on unstable systems that later require extensive rework.
Each phase includes decision points where we review progress with you and confirm we're meeting your expectations before proceeding. This collaborative approach means you stay involved throughout development rather than simply receiving a finished product at the end. Your feedback at each stage helps guide the work toward your vision while benefiting from our technical expertise.
Standards and Best Practices
Our methodology incorporates established game development standards and industry best practices.
User Experience Research
We apply principles from game user experience research to inform interface design and player feedback systems. Studies on player engagement and retention patterns guide our progression design decisions.
Technical Standards
Our development follows established software engineering practices for game architecture, ensuring code maintainability and technical reliability. We adhere to platform-specific requirements for performance and compatibility.
Quality Assurance Protocols
We implement systematic testing procedures throughout development, including functional testing, balance testing, and user acceptance testing. This multi-layered approach catches issues before they reach players.
Educational Standards
For educational partnerships, we ensure games align with recognized learning frameworks and curriculum standards. Our approach integrates pedagogical best practices with engaging gameplay mechanics.
Safety and Data Protection
Our save data systems follow industry standards for data persistence and recovery. We implement backup protocols and validation checks to protect player progress. For projects involving younger audiences, we adhere to applicable privacy regulations and age-appropriate content guidelines.
Migration protocols include multiple verification stages to ensure data integrity throughout the transition process. Rollback procedures are always available in case unexpected issues arise, protecting both player data and your game's reputation.
Understanding Common Development Challenges
Many game development approaches encounter predictable difficulties that our methodology specifically addresses.
Feature Accumulation Without Testing
Traditional development often adds features continuously without testing each addition's impact on the overall experience. This approach leads to bloated games where players feel overwhelmed by options they don't need or want.
Our methodology tests each feature independently before integration, ensuring every addition genuinely improves the player experience rather than simply adding complexity.
Late-Stage Balance Adjustments
Many approaches leave balance work until near completion, discovering too late that core systems don't work well together. Fixing these issues late in development wastes time and resources.
We address balance continuously throughout development, catching issues early when they're easier to fix and don't require rebuilding entire systems.
Assumption-Based Design
Conventional methods often proceed based on what developers think will work rather than what actually resonates with players. This leads to games that make logical sense but fail to engage their intended audience.
Our evidence-based approach uses real player feedback to guide decisions, ensuring games serve actual player preferences rather than theoretical ideals.
Inadequate Technical Planning
Projects that don't plan technical architecture carefully often encounter problems that require extensive rework. Save systems built without considering future needs frequently fail when games need updates or platform migrations.
We design technical systems with future needs in mind, creating architectures that support evolution without requiring complete rebuilds.
How Our Approach Addresses These Gaps
The Dudush Tetiana methodology specifically targets these common weaknesses through systematic practices. By testing continuously, gathering real feedback, and planning technical architecture carefully, we avoid the pitfalls that cause many game projects to struggle or fail.
This doesn't mean we claim perfection or that our approach suits every project. Rather, we've identified patterns that work consistently well for arcade and simple games, and we apply these patterns thoughtfully to each new project. The result is more predictable outcomes and fewer surprises during development.
What Makes Our Methodology Distinctive
Several aspects of our approach distinguish our work from conventional game development practices.
Specialized Focus
Rather than attempting every game type, we concentrate on arcade and simple formats where we've developed deep expertise. This specialization allows us to refine our approach specifically for these game categories.
Our experience with kingdom-building mechanics, save data systems, and educational partnerships means we bring accumulated knowledge to projects rather than learning as we go.
Evidence Over Intuition
We prioritize testing and feedback over assumptions about what will work. This commitment to evidence means we make decisions based on observed player behavior rather than developer preferences.
While intuition informs initial designs, we validate those intuitions through structured testing before committing to approaches that might not serve players well.
Collaborative Development
We involve you throughout the process rather than working in isolation until completion. Regular check-ins and decision points ensure the game evolves toward your vision with our technical guidance.
This collaboration means you understand the development process and can make informed decisions about trade-offs and priorities as they arise.
Modern Techniques Applied Thoughtfully
We incorporate current game development techniques and tools where they serve the project effectively. This includes modern data persistence methods, contemporary user interface patterns, and current platform capabilities. However, we don't adopt new approaches simply because they're novel.
Each technique we use must demonstrate clear benefits for your specific project. This pragmatic approach ensures we apply technology purposefully rather than experimentally, reducing risk while keeping projects current with industry standards.
Continuous Improvement Commitment
Our methodology itself evolves as we learn from each project. Successful techniques get incorporated into our standard practices, while approaches that prove less effective get refined or replaced. This ongoing improvement means later projects benefit from lessons learned in earlier work.
We document these learnings systematically, building institutional knowledge that informs how we approach new challenges. This accumulated experience represents one of our most valuable assets in serving your development needs effectively.
How We Track Progress and Success
Measuring outcomes helps us ensure development stays on track and games meet their intended goals.
During Development
Testing Session Feedback
We measure tester engagement, identify confusion points, and track how quickly players understand core mechanics.
Milestone Completion
We track development progress against planned milestones, identifying delays early and adjusting timelines as needed.
Technical Performance
We monitor load times, frame rates, and system stability to ensure games run smoothly on target platforms.
Balance Metrics
We analyze progression speeds, resource availability, and challenge difficulty to maintain engaging gameplay.
Post-Launch
Player Retention
We track how many players return after initial sessions, measuring engagement strength over time.
Session Duration
Average playtime per session indicates whether games hold player attention effectively.
Technical Reliability
Error rates, crash reports, and save system performance demonstrate technical quality.
Goal Achievement
For educational games, we measure learning outcomes. For partnerships, we assess institutional satisfaction.
Setting Realistic Expectations
Success metrics vary significantly based on game type, audience, and goals. A kingdom-building game targeting casual players has different success criteria than an educational game designed for classroom use. We work with you to define appropriate success measures for your specific project.
Our experience across multiple projects provides benchmarks for typical performance, helping you understand whether results meet, exceed, or fall short of reasonable expectations. This context-aware approach ensures you can evaluate outcomes meaningfully rather than comparing against irrelevant standards.
Game development methodology determines not only how efficiently projects proceed but also the quality of final outcomes. At Dudush Tetiana, our systematic approach to arcade and simple game creation emerged from recognizing that these formats require different development practices than large-scale game production. The focused nature of arcade games demands precision rather than breadth, making methodological rigor particularly important.
Kingdom-building mechanics present specific challenges that generic development approaches often handle poorly. These games require careful balance between player agency and system complexity, a balance best achieved through iterative testing rather than theoretical design. Our methodology addresses these challenges explicitly through structured phases that build complexity gradually while maintaining playability at each stage.
Save data migration represents another area where systematic methodology proves essential. Player progress carries significant emotional and practical value, making data loss unacceptable. Our migration protocols follow engineering best practices while addressing the specific challenges of game save formats. This technical discipline results in the high success rates we've maintained across numerous migration projects.
Educational and governmental partnerships introduce additional requirements beyond typical game development. These projects must satisfy both gaming best practices and institutional standards simultaneously. Our methodology accommodates these dual requirements through collaborative development where educational experts and game designers work together throughout the process. This integration ensures games meet learning objectives while remaining engaging for their intended audience, addressing a challenge that conventional development approaches often struggle to resolve effectively.
Interested in Our Development Approach?
We'd be happy to discuss how our methodology can serve your specific game development needs.
Get In Touch